Publications
The orthodox method of distinguishing between property and obligation often used to prioritise insolvency claims results, at times, in ill-fitting equitable remedies – being designed to resolve legal difficulties between two parties, rather than to deliver the multi-party policy goals of insolvency law. The goals of trusts law are based on doctrinal principles. Yet they frequently have to give way when faced with compelling policy ends. Trusts Credit Security and Trading takes in the Quistclose trusts, De Mattos v Gibson principle, resale proceeds retention of title and trading trusts in seeking to illustrate in what manners, and for what reasons, proprietary remedies should be constrained and modified by policy considerations.
S$35 (Singapore) / US$35 (Other Countries)
(excluding postage charges)
