Centre for Legal Theory
People
Personal Particulars
Associate Professor Nicole ROUGHAN
Associate Professor
Department & Institution
Faculty of Law
The Univeristy of Auckland
Email Contact
n.roughan@auckland.ac.nz
Associate Professor
Department & Institution
Faculty of Law
The Univeristy of Auckland
Email Contact
n.roughan@auckland.ac.nz
Affiliation
Research Interests
Global governance and Transnational Law
Jurisprudence
Legal Pluralism
Political Philosophy
Theories of Indigenous Law
Jurisprudence
Legal Pluralism
Political Philosophy
Theories of Indigenous Law
Representative Publications
Nicole Roughan & Andrew Halpin (eds), In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press 2017)
Nicole Roughan, ‘From authority to authorities: bridging the social/normative divide’ in Roger Cotterrell & Maksymilian Del Mar (eds), Authority in Transnational Legal Theory (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016) 280
Nicole Roughan, ‘Mind the Gaps: Authority and Legality in International Law’ (2016) 27(2) European Journal of International Law 329
Nicole Roughan, ‘Sources and the Normativity of International Law: From Validity to Justification’ in Jean D’Aspremont, Samantha Besson, & Sévrine Knuchel (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017) 680
Nicole Roughan, ‘The Official Point of View and the Official Claim to Authority’ (2018) 38(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 191
Nicole Roughan, ‘From authority to authorities: bridging the social/normative divide’ in Roger Cotterrell & Maksymilian Del Mar (eds), Authority in Transnational Legal Theory (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016) 280
Nicole Roughan, ‘Mind the Gaps: Authority and Legality in International Law’ (2016) 27(2) European Journal of International Law 329
Nicole Roughan, ‘Sources and the Normativity of International Law: From Validity to Justification’ in Jean D’Aspremont, Samantha Besson, & Sévrine Knuchel (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017) 680
Nicole Roughan, ‘The Official Point of View and the Official Claim to Authority’ (2018) 38(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 191